Wer auch nach dem ersten re:publica Tag noch fit genug ist, weiteren spannenden Input aufzunehmen, sei auf den zweiten Pecha-Kucha-Abend beim Liquid Democracy e.V. hingewiesen. Neben meiner Wenigkeit stellen dort am 8. Mai, ab 18.30 Uhr Expert*innen aus Forschung und Praxis ihre Arbeit aus den Bereichen digitale Demokratie, Civic Tech, freie Software und Open Data vor.
Blockchain technology changes more than the financial industry. Scientists have proposed revolutionary concepts for managing our democracy, forests and other natural systems as well as the way we work. Discussing potential benefits and risks, I will introduce “Futarchy” and similar DAO governance models to change political systems, “terra0” which proposes a self-owned augmented forest and a concept to compensate founders and employees at re:publica 2017. Come and see my talk live at Stage 5 on Monday, May 8th, at 12.15h. Learn more at re-publica.com.
Im ausverkauften Lido Berlin durfte ich Anfang März am Science Slam teilnehmen, der mir wirklich größten Spaß bereitet hat. In nur 10 Minuten habe ich versucht, die letzten beiden Jahre Forschung zum Thema „Demokratie im Unternehmen“ möglichst unterhaltsam und verständlich zu vermitteln. Wer nicht dabei sein konnte, hat nun die Möglichkeit sich meinen Auftritt bei YouTube in aller Ruhe anzusehen. (Oder auf den Seiten von ARD alpha.)
My article on a new approach towards a design theory for participation in organizations has been published in the Journal of Enterprise Information Management as part of a Special Issue on „Managing Enterprises in the 21st Century.“ Buidling on more than 20 expert interviews with managers of small and large firms in Germany, we develop a framework for computer-supported organizational participation. We show how employee competence and leadership commitment are as important as the workload and support as well as an option for anonymous communication.
You can access the paper at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/JEIM-01-2016-0007.
In December, I had the chance to present my research at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) in Dublin, Ireland. When it comes to organizational participation (e.g., internal crowdsourcing, open innovation), anonymity becomes increasingly important as it might encourage otherwise reticent employees to speak their (true) mind. However, providing an option for anonymous communication might also affect the way users perceive content. More specifically, in our paper, we ask whether anonymity decreases message persuasiveness. We design an experiment that is based on the intermediating factors perceived social presence, user credibility, and user involvement.
You can find out more and download the paper at http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016/HumanBehavior/Presentations/1/.
Last night, there was a strict time limit for my presentation: 6 minutes and 40 seconds. Following the PechaKucha style, I introduced the audience of this year’s meeting of the Research Network Liquid Democracy to our study on anonymity and persuasion.
Moreover, there were colleagues from Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and Berlin Social Science Center presenting their work on public (i.e., citizen) participation. Most notably, Tobias Escher talked about his outstanding research design for a parallel, longitudal study in three German citites that addresses several shortcomings of research on digital participation hetherto. The project will survey both users and non-users, both on- and offline.